There are many similarities and differences between the
scenes of the creature and the bear watching humans. When the bear first sees
the human it feels fear, but as time goes on the bear watches more closely on
the humans and learns by observation. Both the bear and the creature question
themselves as who they are, what they are, as they are observing the human
life. The creature feels so different from the human that he puts himself down,
wishing he could be exactly like the beautiful humans, rather than his ugly,
monstrous self. Over time the creature has fits of rage, taking his anger about
himself out on other humans and animals. Once the creature realizes he cannot
be like the humans, he wishes for one just like him. The bear is also a violent
animal, but after exposing himself to the woman he had been watching, he tries
to make himself less violent and even takes care of the baby. The bear has a
more positive outcome of this learning, simply wondering what he would be like
as a man, wishing he was a man. The creature learns language and human social
manners, but feels lonely when watching them interact with each other. Both
attempt to make “human” sounds, with each making their own progress of grunting
and moaning. The creature eventually learns how to successfully speak the human
language, while the bear did not. Of all of the parallels between these two
stories, the creature seemed to have been smarter than the bear. Although the
bear realizes and accepts that he is a bear, the creature was able to observe
the humans and correctly mimic their lives, like their language and social
interactions; even if he wasn’t completely accepting himself for who he was. The
bear has a home to go back to, with the rest of the bears, whereas the creature
must find his master to have a purpose in his life.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Cloning
As a member of the UCLA, I believe that it is important to
support stem cell research and possibilities for cloning. It is vital to think
of how these could positively affect the future, medically and culturally.
Cloning could possibly help with diseases in the future, which is the biggest
incentive to continue this kind of research. Obviously there are many against
these research methods, but along with stem cell research and cloning,
regulations will be necessary. As long as there are strict regulations that the
researches stick to, there isn’t anything wrong with cloning or stem cell
research. For example, the cells used should be ones that would have been
disposed of otherwise. Before any actual “research” is done, there should be a
committee that approves of all parts of the ‘experiment’ before it is started. Also,
every scientist involved should have gone through a specific process of
interviewing before being put in the research group. Each has to have had a
good education and experience background, and interviewed by the committee. There
will also be many safety precautions, for the subjects, scientists and more. In
no way will these research methods reflect on this Christian group as
portraying God, (by creating more humans) but simply to continue modern
scientific discoveries with what we have learned and what is available. Even
after these rules are put forth, if any of them are broken (by a scientist or
other participant) there will be heavy consequences. Also, if there were to be
any accidents or tragedies with any the research itself, the rules may be
changed or altered.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)